SuStel:
Let's assume the -be' applies only to the -laH. Not able, resume, eat. This might mean we resume being not able to eat maSopqa'laH means we are able to resume eating or we resume being able to eat.
So, if I understand correctly, one of the possible interpretations of the word {maSopqa'laHbe'} is with the suffix {-qa'} acting solely on the suffix {-laH}. Right ? If I understand your explanation correctly, this is a very interesting fact. Lets consider another example, to see if I understand this correctly.. The {jIqawchoHchu'} can mean either "I begin to remember perfectly", or "I perfectly begin to remember". So, adding a {-be'} to the mix.. The {jIqawchoHchu'be'} can mean either "I begin to not perfectly remember", or "I don't perfectly begin to remember". So, to summarize, if we have a verb with two "normal" suffixes and a rover, the possibilities are: 1. The two "normal" suffixes and the rover apply on the verb, each one independently from the other. 2. Any one of the "normal" suffixes and the rover, can apply on each other, before applying on the verb. Would you agree with the above ? - bara'qa'