On 21 November 2016 at 19:23, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 11/21/2016 12:51 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
{mo'Dajvo' pa'wIjDaq je narghpu' He'So'bogh SajlIj}
I knew of using {-vo'} and {-Daq} at the beginning of a sentence, in order to express the "from ---> to"; but somehow I had the idea that the two nouns can't be joined by the {je}. If this sentence is correct (is it ?) I will be happy to assimilate this knowledge.
The SkyBox cards have the following notice, so {je} can join nouns marked with a type-5 suffix: {Paramount Pictures malja' permey bIH Star Trek pong'e' Deghmey'e' je} But note that the {je} here is joining two nouns with the same suffix.
There's no rule against it. There's a theoretical reason not to do it, which is not demonstrated one way or another in canon so far as I know: it might make sense if you cannot stylistically join nouns of dissimilar syntactic roles.
Or maybe you can join certain pairs when it makes sense, like {-vo'} and {-Daq}, and even then it's seen as a slight bending of the rules. Most of the time, sticking a {je} on {Xvo' YDaq} would only change the emphasis and not the meaning, "it went from A and to B" vs. "it went from A to B". -- De'vID