nIqolay Q:
{pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH}
What is the {mo'} ? qunnoq On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
I freely admit that my example is wrong… that’s why I suggested someone else explain the subtleties of {‘elmoH} – which are frequently discussed on this list. I added an unnecessary comma merely to separate the two parts of the sentence, but brackets would have done as well. ({pa’} is probably not the best example as it means both “room” and “there(abouts)”, the latter never taking {-Daq}.)
--Voragh
From: tlhIngan-Hol [mailto:tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org] On Behalf Of nIqolay Q
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
So, the following sentence which voragh wrote:
voragh:
pa'Daq mo’ DOG lu'elmoH in the room, they caused the dog to enter the cage
Is wrong, and should be {pa'Daq, dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} ?
If I'm correct about the {-moH/-vaD} thing (and I like to think that I am, though Voragh has far more canon knowledge than I do), then yes, his example was wrong, and {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} would be correct. (The comma is probably unnecessary.)
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org