28 Jul
2016
28 Jul
'16
2:45 a.m.
read this : Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS kahless united the tribes of kronos ..good for him ; but for the rest of us, why the {muvchuqmoH} takes an object ? according to tkd, when the {-chuq} suffix is used, the verb prefix must indicate "no object". that is the word which bears the {-chuq} can't take an object. the ones that are {-chuq"ed"}, must be the recipients of each others actions. they can't {-chuq} each other, and then all of them together {-chuq} someone else too. now, perhaps this sentence stands because we have the {-moH}, on the {muvchuq} ; but even so, I can't bring myself to *feeling* the combined meaning of {-chuq} {-moH} with that of a subject too. mop qIj