SuStel:
It's not wrong. It's just not using Klingon in its strongest way.
ok, I understand ! thank you for explaining this ! qunnoq On Sep 29, 2017 21:05, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 9/29/2017 1:53 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
I still don't understand..{qay'wI'} for "something that is a problem" is wrong ?
qunnoq
On Sep 29, 2017 20:50, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 9/29/2017 1:42 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
ghunchu'wI':
toH. «qay'wI'» DalaDDI', nuq Dayaj?
I would understand "something that is a problem". Am I wrong ?
*vungwI'** something that hurricanes.*
No, *qay'wI'* is *something that is a problem.* But you were having trouble understanding *vungwI',* so ghunchu'wI' compared it to *qay'wI',* which you use all the time.
Personally, I wouldn't use *qay'wI'* as often as you do, and wouldn't at all for *hurricane.* I wouldn't say *qay'wI' vIghaj* or *qay'wI' tu'lu';* I'd say *qay' vay'.* I WOULD use *qay'wI'* in a sentence like *qay'wI' yIngu'** Identify the thing that is a problem.* But once that had been identified, I would at most use it as an adjectival verb: *jolvoy' qay' vItI'** I fix the problematical transporter ionizer unit.* Klingon likes precision.
It's not wrong. It's just not using Klingon in its strongest way.
-- SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org