3 Oct
2017
3 Oct
'17
11:21 a.m.
On 10/3/2017 10:46 AM, Lieven wrote:
On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases: {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.}
Am 03.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb SuStel:
That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*
You are definitely right, that's more accurate. I had the same thing in mind as well. But then I thought like, hey, I already said it's a BABY. No need to mention the {Hom}-part any more.
I wouldn't want to approach this too much like a math problem. Suffixes aren't exactly like mathematical operators. A *loDHom* is a different thing than a *loD,* not just a *loD* that's had the operation of minorness performed on it. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name