ok, I understand the difference between a time span and a time stamp. so, applying this distinction in the {qaStaHvIS} discussion, I understand that: "..when we are using time stamps, the {qaStaHvIS} may or may not be used, depending on the occasion. but when we are using time periods, then the {qaStaHvIS} is absolutely necessary.." would you agree with the above ? and something else. since {DIS vorgh} is a time stamp, would you agree with {Soch DIS vorgh jIQuch} for "the previous 7 years I was happy" ? qunnoH jan puqloD ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta' On 28 Dec 2016 4:25 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 12/28/2016 9:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
any two consecutive days is a time span of two days. for example sm, mt, tw, wt, tf, fs.
But which two are the ones you're talking about in the hypothetical **cha' jaj mavum*? As a time stamp, you should be able to point out an exact point, just as you could with "Monday."
but I can't understand.. why can't a week, or a year be a time stamp ? why can't we consider the {DIS vorgh} to be a time stamp ?
It IS a time stamp. *DIS vorgh* is a particular year that I can point to on a calendar. But just *DIS* is not a time stamp; I can't point to "year" on a calendar. Which year?
-- SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org