Re: [tlhIngan Hol] imperatives with {-'eghmoH} and verbs of activities

De'vID:

There are plenty of canon examples which should've alerted you that it's otherwise, e.g., {yIqIm}, {yIbuS}, {pa' yIQam}, etc

Yes, you're right. I can't understand how this misconception came to my mind. Perhaps in the past I read about the be-verbs needing to bear the {-'eghmoH} in imperatives, however, me then understanding "ok, any intransitive verb takes the {-'eghmoH} in its' imperative form". Anyway, this proves that we need to reread the relevant Ca'Non from time to time, in order to avoid any misconceptions becoming permanent. ~ Dana'an I love you maltz