Re: [tlhIngan Hol] *'op* and inherently plural nouns / *-ta'be'* / *Get responsible!*

luis chaparro:

2. If I want to say *She hasn't sold it*, I can say *ngevpu'be'*. What would *ngevta'be'* mean? That she set out to sell it, but she didn't accomplished it? Has *-ta'be'* always the meaning of failing? Or can we also use it just to negate that an action took place?

If you'd like you could check out these discussions: http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2019-September/013132.ht... http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2020-April/014757.html http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2020-April/014866.html -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ