Am 02.06.2019 um 10:26 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
I understand a wiki to be a virtual location, so I decided to play it safe.
That's a good point. We have a canon example {qep'a' wejDIchDaq} so it seems also virtual locations are acceptable. (okay, we may argue now whether an event is a location or not) The rule about {-Daq} being only used as a locative was only to make the difference clear to "IN chinese" or other expressions that use the word "in".
So, personally, I don't think we could safely (based on one example), begin using them.
That's a good attitude.
Let alone the fact, that I *truly* don't understand the specific qao of Hugh.
He wrote: {nuq 'oS «chel» 'e' vISovbejbe'.} I understand it as "I don't know what 'chel' represents." but I see that it causes some ambiguity, because it can be rad differently. To avoid that, I would suggest {Doch'e' 'oSbogh «chel» vISovbe'.} But maybe I haven't followed the conversation, so I might miss the point. :-) -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.de http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/QuestionAsObject