Thank you so much for telling me ! This incident reminds me of my {-chugh} misunderstanding, when I started writing in klingon ; Then I believed, that the {-chugh} can be used in a similar way to the english "whether". Luckily -way back then- De'vID had written "if in an english sentence, the "if" can be replaced with "whether" and still make sense, then that sentence can't use the klingon {-chugh}". Or something like this.. Anyway, I'm happy I finally learned this important information, which concerns the proper use of {-vaD}. mop Hurgh qunnoq On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:06 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 6/24/2016 11:05 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Perhaps now I'm beginning to understand my problem.
In klingon the {-vaD} can ONLY be used as a beneficiary-for, and NOT as a purpose-for, right ? Is this where my mistake actually lies ? That I'm using the {-vaD} as a purpose-for instead of a beneficiary-for ?
I think that is the case, yes.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org