Am 14.10.2023 um 23:37 schrieb De'vID:
Why not? It's possible to {HoS lIng} in canon, and I don't see how fire is less of a product than energy.
Well, some people - including me - argued that when you produce something, there must be some kind of product. Energy is something you can store, but not fire. qurgh said: <<Fire isn't produced, light and heat are produced by fire. Something can start the chemical reaction called fire, but it can't produce a chemical reaction.>> But anyway, Maltz has now confirmed that {lIng} is okay:
You can {lIng} a fire, but you’re more likely to {chenmoH} or {vemmoH} it.
Didn't you already have this conversation back in 2020?
No; The dicussion back than was about how to say call "extinguish" a fire, which is {QongmoH}. The opposite from that was {vemmoH} -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.tlhInganHol.com http://klingon.wiki/En/NewWordsQepHom2020