9 Feb
2021
9 Feb
'21
12:04 p.m.
nIqolay Q:
But that grammar has never been elaborated on and we have no other examples, so it's probably best not to mess too much with it.
Yes, indeed. But it's truly a pity though.. With the law'/puS construction being rigid the way it is, I wish we were given the liberty to play with it, even if that meant having the freedom to place a simple type-9 clause before the {puS} part. ~ Dana'an I love you maltz