[tlhIngan Hol] {-Daq} and {-bogh} and {Sumbogh} and {Hopbogh}

Suppose I want to say: "At Canada there are bears. Near Canada is America". And I want to say all this in a single sentence. So I write: qa'naDa'Daq Sumbogh 'amerI'qa' mIl'oDmey tu'lu' at canada where america is near there are bears Would this be correct? Or is this "the ship on which I fled" problem? Perhaps, translating the {-bogh} as "where" seems weird, but in tkd it says that "Relative clauses are translated into English as phrases beginning with <who, which, where> and most commonly <that>" -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ