10 Aug
2017
10 Aug
'17
8:07 a.m.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
...Consider the following: {[vaS'a']vo' [tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach]Daq chegh} {[tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qachDaq vaS'a']vo' chegh}
Qo'. You seem to be suggesting that we parse {tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach} and {tera'Daq DIvI' raghom qachDaq vaS'a'} as noun phrases bearing a Type 5 suffix on the final noun. However, that treatment violates the prohibition of a Type 5 suffix on the first noun of such a phrase. I will not consider them further. -- ghunchu'wI'