I understand the replies given so far, however I can't understand the reason which prohibits the full use of {HeghmoH} as a be-verb, i.e. its use in the way of {tera' yav 'atlhqam HeghmoH} for "fatal mushroom". Is this happening because of the presence of {-moH} ? qunnoq On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Brent Kesler <brent.of.all.people@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:57 AM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
If a first officer assassinates a captain for weakness, you'd say HoD HoH yaS wa'DIch the first officer kills the captain, not HoD HeghmoH yaS wa'DIch the first officer is fatal to the captain, even though the sentence is perfectly grammatical. Again, this is just my opinion.
If I heard someone say HoD HeghmoH yaS wa'DIch, I'd assume the first officer didn't intend to kill the captain.
HIchDal SeHlawDaq ba'pu' yaS QIp, 'ej HoD HeghmoHpu'. The stupid officer sat on the airlock control panel and caused the captain to die.
Or maybe that he didn't kill the captain directly.
QuSpu' cheng Sa', 'ej Qang HeghmoH. General Chang conspired and caused the chancellor to die.
bI'reng
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org