3 Oct
2017
3 Oct
'17
10:50 a.m.
Unless it's said during {mu'qaD veS}! Actually, both versions would be pretty insulting come to think of it. --Voragh -----Original Message----- From: tlhIngan-Hol [mailto:tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org] On Behalf Of Lieven On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases: {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.}
Am 03.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb SuStel:
That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*
You are definitely right, that's more accurate. I had the same thing in mind as well. But then I thought like, hey, I already said it's a BABY. No need to mention the {Hom}-part any more. -- Lieven L. Litaer