*resign *'oS *paj*. *pav* DaghItlh 'e' DaHech 'e' vIHar. Le jeu. 2 juill. 2020, à 18 h 02, Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net> a écrit :
On Jul 2, 2020, at 8:41 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
During battle, an officer sees on the screen something which is surely an armed ship closing in at warp 3 and something else which seems to be a ship which is more heavily armed closing in at warp 7.
Is there a reason why we couldn't say the following ?
DujHey Qob law' Dujna' Qob puS the apparent ship is more dangerous than the definite ship
I can’t think of a reason why that would be controversial. Canon provides plenty of examples of noun suffixes on nouns, including nouns in comparative constructions.
[end of grammatical advice; start of editorial comment]
In this situation, however, I would use a different verb: {paj} “be urgent”. Until its status as a heavily-armed ship is confirmed, its threat level is unknown. It just requires more immediate attention.
— ghunchu'wI' _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org