18 Sep
2019
18 Sep
'19
9:24 a.m.
I've always wondered with regards to the placement of the {-be'} relative to the {-pu'} and {-ta'}. As far as the {-pu'} is concerned, since the tkd has the Ca'Non example of {vIta'pu'be'}, I decided to *always* write {-pu'be'} instead of {-be'pu'}. Before I continue, does anyone have something to comment on the above ? And now I continue.. However, I'm still puzzled as far as the placement of the {-be'} relative to the {-ta'} is concerned. So far, I just flipped a coin in order to decide.. But since there are days, when you reach into your pocket without finding any change, I'd like to ask: Are there any Ca'Non examples of the {-be'} relative to the {-ta'} ? And if there aren't, then what the @!#! should I do ? ~ m. qunen'oS