Yes, and the analysis is the same. On 12/20/2016 11:48 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
maj. and if I wrote:
{tugh Dujmaj Qaw'lu'. vIghro'meymo' 'e' vISov} for "soon our ship will be destroyed; because of the cats I know it". would that be correct as well ?
qunnoH jan puqloD
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:39 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 12/20/2016 11:30 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
assume I want to say:
"soon our ship will be destroyed; because of you I know it".
so I write: {tugh Dujmaj Qaw'lu'. SoHmo' 'e' vISov}. Is this correct ? or the {'e'} instead of referring to the {tugh Dujmaj Qaw'lu'}, will be referring to the {SoHmo'} ?
SoHmo' can mean two different things: because of you, or because you are. But SoHmo' is not a sentence all by itself, and there are no nouns for a copula, so the 'e' can't be referring to it. Therefore the 'e' must be referring to tugh Dujmaj Qaw'lu' and SoHmo' is a cause-phrase attached to the front of the sentence 'e' vISov.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name