I’m not sure that everyone would interpret your Klingon statement as you intend. Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 11, 2020, at 12:32 PM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
nIqolay Q:
Or use a longer phrase: qeylIS quvmoHmeH lat. By seeing that the referent is continually mentioned, the reader will hopefully conclude that they're someone important. (ghaH lat might have a similar effect, because it's an unusual phrasing, but that suggestion would no doubt be controversial.)
Your comments gave me the following idea:
{ghaH'e' quvmoHmeH loD, lat chenmoHpu'}
Here, the {ghaH} *has* to refer to the supernatural being, while at the same time not specifying who/what this being is. In other words it's the "He/Him" equivalent, we've been looking for.
So now we have a complete pie *and* a full dog ! (greek equivalent of "we can have our cake, and eat it too")
Thanks !!!
~ Qa'yIn _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org