DloraH:
But "we", by its nature, refers to more than one entity. vIghro' is singular.
I'm afraid I can't understand the point you are trying to make. If we say {Hoch vIghro'} then we mean "each cat"". If we say {Hoch vIghro'mey} then we mean "all cats". By the same rationale {Hoch maH} must mean "all we". vIghro'mey = many cats maH = us (a number of people being considered together). (The {-mey} is included in the concept of {maH}). I'm not arguing here, in order to prove that {maH Hoch} is indeed correct. That's something for the grammarians to decide. (And as soon as they decide I would appreciate it, if they told me too). But I just can't understand, how the {Hoch maH} could be considered to mean ""all the us's", "all the we's", as in multiple groups"". ~ nI'ghma