[tlhIngan Hol] is this grammatically correct ?

Suppose I write: {raS retlhDaq Qot voDleH; pa' Qotbogh je nuvpu'vaD jatlh..} for: "the emperor was reclining next to the table; he said for the people who were reclining there too.." Would the klingon sentence be grammatically correct ? I'm troubled by the {je} following a {-bogh} clause, and I don't know whether the {pa'} can refer *only* to the {Qotbogh}. I know I could express the desired meaning in other ways too, but I can't stop wondering whether the klingon sentence is actually correct. ~ bara'qa'