The {A X law’ B X puS} formula does suggest that there is some numerical “quantitativeness” to qualities of things. Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2019, at 20:15, Daniel Dadap <daniel@dadap.net> wrote:
On Mar 19, 2019, at 18:58, Will Martin <willmartin2@mac.com> wrote:
The core issue here is whether or not being beautiful is numerically measurable.
Agreed. For the purposes of this discussion, I was working under the assumption that either Klingons measure beauty numerically, or that they use metaphorical numeric comparisons to compare non-numeric things, like English can. Neither of those assumptions seem like particularly good ones, and I’m not aware of any canon to support them, of course. _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org