De'vID:
wotvaD mojaq vIchel'eghmoHta'DI' Dayajbe''a'?
I can understand the meaning of the sentence, but I can't understand the grammar. Since we have the {-'egh}, I can't understand how the verb which carries it can obtain a subject. jIH for Aurelie Demonchaux:
however Aurelie, don't worry.. tomorrow, I will search my notes, and copy-paste what was said at that thread
luckily, I was able to locate the thread. go to: http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2016-July/000911.html and then press "next message" in order to see the rest of the replies. qunnoH jan puqloD On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:07 AM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 12/20/2016 5:50 PM, De'vID wrote:
On Dec 20, 2016 19:52, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
however, when a word carries the {-'egh}, isn't that word incapable of
having an object ?
De'vID:
romuluSngan HoH'eghmoHlaH'a' tlhIngan?
I can't understand this.. "the klingon is able to make himself kill the romulan" ?
Is this canon
wotvaD mojaq vIchel'eghmoHta'DI' Dayajbe''a'?
I can follow the English-to-Klingon logic of these sentences, but I do not see the sequence of grammatical rules that construct them from Klingon originally and legally. Unless you're saying that we can read this as vI- [chel'egh] -moH I cause it to self-add, where chel'egh is being treated as a separate verb.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org