31 Oct
2016
31 Oct
'16
10:16 a.m.
On 10/31/2016 9:50 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
However, as lieven pointed out, if we analyze {Hochlogh} we will see that it possesses {Hoch} and {-logh}, which brings its "literal" meaning awfully close (in a good way), to "each/every time".
So, why not use it in order to describe the "each time" concept ?
*-logh* doesn't mean "times"; it turns the number it's attached to into an adverbial meaning how many times something happens. *Hochlogh* refers to the number of times something happens (all the times!), not each individual instance. If you can't put *reH *in its place and get exactly the same meaning (with altered emphasis), you're not using it right. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name