Unless a sentence comes from 'oqranD, then it isn't canon. I don't care if a friend of maltz wrote it, I don't care if the rest of the community considers this friend of maltz an expert; I don't care if kahless himself said it, if it isn't from 'oqranD it isn't canon. Even if God himself wrote it and told me "mayqel this is canon", I would not accept it. Sometime in the past, when I was writing in english and my words -according to an expert here-, didn't concern klingon, he wrote: "The hundreds of people on this list, didn't join in order to read your (whatever it was I was writing about)". So, rephrasing his warm and kind words, I will say that: "The hundreds of people on this list didn't join in order to learn a friend of maltz's klingon; they joined to learn okrandian klingon". And something else, because there is here an obvious confusion with regards to who-is-who.. Expert: Someone who knows everything and is able to provide correct and valid answers, in accordance to THE CANON WHICH ONLY OKRAND CREATES. So, unless 'oqranD says that he read/wrote/approved each and every klingon sentence and translation of it, I refuse to accept it as canon. qunnoq On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 11.08.2017 um 07:51 schrieb Lieven:
There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian canon.
No confusion intended: I mean "OUR Okrandian canon".
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH ghobDI' ghu.
-- Lieven L. Litaer aka Quvar valer 'utlh Grammarian of the KLI http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher http://www.klingonwiki.net
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org