On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:09 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
'a, chaq SIvmo' latlhpu', jIghItlh: DIvI Hol lo'lu'chugh, pIj {maH} lo'lu'. 'a {maH} lo'lu'taHvIS, Hoch nuvpu' bopbe'bej mu'mey'Daj.
bIqar. rut 'IjwI' bopbe' mu'tlhegh jatlhbogh «maH». DaH De' nap Da'ang 'e' neH vItlhob: 'Iv Da'oS? 'Iv chaH nIngaSbogh «maH»'e'? vay' Daj vItu'. bIja'pu':
qaStaHvIS yIn, mamobchu'.
Sumobchugh tlhIH, chay' lI'IQmoH «mamobchu'»? Sutay'chugh, qatlh Su'IQnIS? It's arguably a matter of style, but I don't think there is a good reason for your stylistic habit of stating personal opinions using the plural {maH} instead of the singular {jIH}. If you're going to claim that you're speaking for a group of people, I would like to know who you think that group is. -- ghunchu'wI'