I just noticed something odd. Recently, we were given the noun {noq}, meaning both nipple (anatomy) and nipple (like on a bottle). The plural is {noqDu'} when referring to a body part, and {noqmey} when referring to bottles. In KGT, we were told this about {DeSqIv}: <A {bargh} is probably the most frequently used pot. It is rather large and has a flattened bottom. The smaller {nevDagh} is characterized by its V-shaped handles, termed {DeSqIvDu'} ("elbows"; note that {-Du'}, the plural suffix for body parts, is used here even though the handles are not literally body parts).> Previously, some people have taken this to imply that body parts were a noun class in Klingon, and that body part words take the {-Du'} suffix even when not referring to a body part. But {noq} seems to contradict this. What's going on here? Is one or the other of {noq} or {DeSqIv} an exception to the rule, and if so, what's the rule? Or does each body part word work differently when used to refer to a non-body-part in the plural, and it's just something you have to memorise? Incidentally, the online version of the qep'a' booklet where {noq} was given seems to have disappeared: http://www.kli.org/activities/qepmey/qepa-chamah-wejdich/new-words/ Does anyone have a copy of it? -- De'vID