Isn't that why {DaH} goes before {'e'}, if that's the clause it's meant to modify? reH targh HoH vav DaH 'e' vISov. lay'tel SIvten On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 10.06.2017 um 18:08 schrieb DloraH:
On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 21:58 +0200, Lieven wrote:
Am 09.06.2017 um 21:03 schrieb SuStel:
Oh sure. I'm not saying that an SAO isn't two sentences. It clearly is. I'm saying that it's a sentence composed of sentences. It's both one sentence and two.
Since a verb using a sentence as object creates a new sentence, I think it's very clear that such a SAO-sentence can be the SAO in another sentence.
{targh HoH vav DaneH 'e' vIyaj net Sov.} One knows that I understand you want your father to kill the targ.
[[[[targh HoH vav] DaneH] 'e' vIyaj] net Sov.] [[[[the father kills the targ] you want that] I understand that] one knows it]
But now add an adverbial to each sentence.
That sounds like a true challenge. Theoretically, it should be nested like macros do in software, but that would look very strange:
{reH targh HoH vav} "father always kills targ"
DaH {reH targh HoH vav} 'e' vISov Now I know that "father always kills targ"
I'm not sure that is based on anything canon.
-- Lieven L. Litaer aka Quvar valer 'utlh Grammarian of the KLI http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher http://www.klingonwiki.net _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org