On 4/30/2021 7:58 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
{Dam} lubopbogh cha' Ca'Non mu'tlhegh tu'lu':
HumanvaD 'urwI' wIDam we treat the human as a traitor
'urwI' ghaH 'e' vIDam I consider him (to be) a traitor
cha' mu'tlheghvam DInuDchugh, vaj matlhoj: DIp ('urwI') lo' Hoch mu'tlheghvam. 'a mu'tlheghDaq DIp tu'lu'be'chugh, 'ej wot tu'lu'chugh, vaj jaSHa' {Dam} lo'laH'a' nuv?
jIqon:
Dun SuvwI'vam 'e' vIDam I consider this warrior to be great
lugh'a' {Dam} lo'vam?
Think of *Dam* as meaning /SUBJECT considers SOMEONE/SOMETHING to be OBJECT./ Exactly how that someone or something is identified depends on how you construct the sentence. In *HumanvaD 'urwI' wIDam,* you're using an indirect object to say /We (subject) consider the human (someone) to be a traitor (object). /In *'urwI' ghaH 'e' vIDam,* you're using a separate sentence to identify whom you're talking about, saying /I (subject) consider him (someone) to be-traitor (object)./ So apply this same idea to your proposed sentence: /I (subject) consider this warrior (someone) to be-wonderful./ It follows the same pattern. It works. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name