27 Feb
2017
27 Feb
'17
5:59 a.m.
On 26 February 2017 at 10:45, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
But I do understand the confusion. Since {-ta'} is described as a non continuous counterpart to {-lI'}, there seems to be some intention. Saying {pumta' nagh} sounds like the stone has fallen by its own will.
{-ta'} indicates intention behind the action, but it doesn't necessarily indicate intention on the part of the subject of the verb. {pumta' nagh} is fine, if someone pushed the stone intentionally. -- De'vID