8 Jun
2019
8 Jun
'19
9:14 a.m.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 13:54 Will Martin, <willmartin2@mac.com> wrote:
My read of the note is that ALL NEGATIVE IMPERATIVES USE {Qo’}. In addition to that, some imperatives might also have one or more {-be’}s. I don’t think you can have an imperative that has {-be’} instead of {-Qo’}.
The quoted passage was intended to explain that {HIleghbe'moH} "Cause me to not see" was not ruled out by what's written in TKD. In that sense, it's not about "negative imperatives" at all. It's about {-be'} being allowed to appear in imperatives when the command is a "positive" one (i.e., an order to do something and not an order not to do something). -- De'vID