3 Oct
2017
3 Oct
'17
8:01 p.m.
{loD ghu}, {be' ghu} both look like genitives, not what you're positing. It might be understandable, but it doesn't look like the right way to say what you want. stevo On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:42 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
Would you accept {loD ghu}, {be' ghu} for "male baby", "female baby" ?
I wouldn't, but I would like to see what other people think, with regards to this matter.
mayqel q
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org