15 Jun
2021
15 Jun
'21
7:35 a.m.
On the other hand though, perhaps I'm approaching this the wrong way, and the klingonska article isn't related at all to this paq'batlh sentence. The klingonska article talks about saying that something rains down something. But the paq'batlh line says that the thing which is raining down is blood. In the paq'batlh line we don't have an unspecified subject raining down something else; we have "that something else" being the actual subject. It's just that in the klingonska interview, this possibility wasn't explicitly pointed out.. ~ Dana'an