Re: [tlhIngan Hol] how is the {mapIm ngIq maH} correct ?

SuStel:

So go back to Hoch maH. Do you take the set of us-es as each us performing the action?

ok, I understand this argument. But here is what confuses me: Couldn't the {maH} in the {Hoch maH} construction, be understood as describing lets say ten klingons, thus making the {maH} equivalent to a plural noun ? If context made it clear, that there are only ten klingons, then wouldn't we have: maH = ten klingons ? So, if we can say {Hoch tlhInganpu'} to say "all klingons", then why not say {Hoch maH} for "all (of) us" ? ~ bara'qa'