[tlhIngan Hol] Constructed language

[Will Martin]

All of this implies that the formation of the language is complete. I’d personally be more attracted to {-lI’} than {-pu’}, so long as the vocabulary continues to expand and the grammar continues to surprise us (less frequently, but it happens).

pItlh

charghwI’ ‘utlh
(ghaH, ghaH, -Daj)




> On Dec 1, 2024, at 3:42 AM, Lieven L. Litaer via tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol at lists.kli.org> wrote:
> 
> Am 01.12.2024 um 08:13 schrieb De'vID via tlhIngan-Hol:
>> On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 1:21 AM James Landau via tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-
>> hol at lists.kli.org <mailto:tlhingan-hol at lists.kli.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Would "constructed language (conlang)" in Klingon be *Hol 'oghlu'bogh*?
>> 
>> 
>> I'd understand it but I would personally put a perfective suffix in
>> there: {Hol 'oghlu'pu'bogh} or even {Hol 'oghlu'ta'bogh}.
> I agree with the above, but would like the add the thought that just
> like in English, there is a difference between an invented language and
> a constructed one. So an alternative might be {Hol chenmoHlu'ta'bogh}.
> 
> Not a big difference, just a suggestion.
> 
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany"
> https://tlhInganHol.com
> https://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20241202/271a2560/attachment.htm>