[tlhIngan Hol] {net X} vs. {'e' Xlu'}

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Sat Jun 11 12:43:37 PDT 2022

Le sam. 11 juin 2022 à 15:41, Will Martin <lojmitti7wi7nuv at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> While we are celebrating new potential complexity, since that seems to be
> the whole point of this list much of the time,

The new information doesn't add any potential complexity which wasn't there
before. It just explains a bunch of sentences that we already had in canon.

> {tlhIngan Hol ghojlu’chu’ ‘e’ chavlu’chugh QuchchoH Hoch}
> Not so good, even if it is grammatically legal:
> {tlhIngan Hol ghojlu’chu’ QuchchoH Hoch ‘e’ chavlu’chugh}

It might be grammatically legal, but it doesn't have the same meaning. This
sentence means "one learns Klingon perfectly, if everyone becoming happy is

The sentence I think you had intended would be:
{QuchchoH Hoch, tlhIngan Hol ghojlu'chu' 'e' chavlu'chugh}

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220611/223228a3/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list