[tlhIngan Hol] {ghIq} {ngugh} and time adverbs with time stamps

Will Martin willmartin2 at mac.com
Mon Nov 1 09:31:08 PDT 2021

It was just a suggestion, not a calling out. I saw a message, a response to the message, an explanation of the original message, and an apology for the misunderstanding in the original response, and an explanation following the apology of the …

And I thought I had a suggestion for what might have originally been better communication. It was only a suggestion. It’s certainly not a rule, nor in any way intended to be a harsh critique.

> On Nov 1, 2021, at 11:05 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> charghwI':
>> Maybe if you provided an actual example instead of inventing a grammatical template
>> out of proprietary terms like “meHed noun”, there would have been less misinterpretation
>> and need for explanation. This isn’t Klingon. It’s meta-Klingon.
> Let me ask you something; how many times in the past haven't we used
> in this list the  "proprietary terms" of {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed
> nouns? Why did you feel the need to react *now*?
> -- 
> Dana'an
> https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
> Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list