[tlhIngan Hol] vaj and meqvammo' difference

[Will Martin]

I’ve always used {vaj} for conditional {-chugh} statements. There are many possible cases. If X is the case, {vaj} Y.

I’d more simply say {jIghungpu’mo’ pItSa vIvun.}

That doesn’t make me right and you wrong. I’m just offering a perspective to consider.

bIghungchugh vaj pItSa DavunlaH.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.

> On Oct 6, 2020, at 9:38 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> {vaj} {meqvammo'} bopbogh vay''e' vIyajbe'.
> 
> vaj = so, then, thus, in that case
> meqvammo' = because of this reason
> 
> jIjatlh vIneH: "I was hungry so I ordered a pizza".
> 
> jIghungpu'; vaj pItSa' vIvunpu'
> jIghungpu'; meqvammo' pItSa' vIvunpu'.
> 
> chay' pIm cha' mu'tlheghvam ?
> 
> ~ Qa'yIn
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20201006/462f0e3b/attachment-0016.htm>