[tlhIngan Hol] prefix trick on -bogh clauses

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Tue Oct 27 08:24:26 PDT 2020

On 10/27/2020 9:42 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> ngeb maHvaD vIqraq Danobpu'bogh
> the artifact which you gave for us is fake
> lugh'a' mu'tlheghvam ?


Dependent clauses have the same grammar as basic sentences. *maHvaD 
vIqraq Danobpu'bogh*/the artifact which you gave us/ is a valid relative 
clause, and as with all relative clauses, it may be treated as if it 
were a noun phrase.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20201027/aa2f58ba/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list