[tlhIngan Hol] relative clauses with {Hoch} in noun-noun constructions

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Mon Jan 6 08:00:03 PST 2020

On 1/6/2020 10:51 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> I was under the impression that {Hoch} could mean "everything" only 
> when used on its own, as for instance in {Hoch vor Dargh wIb}.
> My misconception was, that in Hoch-noun constructions, {Hoch} could 
> *only* mean, "each noun", or "all nouns" depending on the presence of 
> {-pu'}/{-mey'} or not.

I dunno, maybe these are true. I don't think we've ever seen *Hoch X* 
mean anything other than /each X,/ but there's also no rule against it 
meaning the more general /X of everything./ Lacking anything concrete, I 
concede that they are possible, if not definite. It's also the reason I 
suggest not overloading the use of *Hoch* when we don't know everything 
about it. Stick to what is known.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200106/1fb738a7/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list