[tlhIngan Hol] unable to use the upper case letter to specify by not specifying

[SuStel]

On 8/12/2020 1:51 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> And yes, I think I remember that the second verb in an SAO isn’t 
> supposed to take a Type 9 suffix. I just think this statement is 
> better expressed by ignoring the rule. Or maybe there is no such rule

chutqoqvetlh Dajalpu'. mu'tlhegh wa'DIchDaq mojaq Segh Hut 
chaw'be'lu'law'. chutvam maqbe'lu'pu' 'ach Dawemchugh DapHey Dajatlh.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name