[tlhIngan Hol] does someone vor a disease or a person ?

[De'vID]

On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 14:05, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> All these years I took for granted, that the object of vor can be
> either the patient or the disease.
>
> But only recently I realized, that in the Ca'Non example of {Hoch vor
> Dargh wIb} the translation is given as "sour tea cures everything",
> and not as "sour tea cures everyone" (with the "everyone" referring to
> patients).
>

{nuvvaD rop vor Qel} ghaytan jatlhlu'.

So one *could* wonder whether we could indeed use the {vor} to say
> things like {nuv rop vorta' Qel} "the doctor cured the patient".
>

'Iv rop vorta' Qel? 'orwI'vaD 'Iv rop vorta' Qel. ({'Iv} latlh jIyweS
yIqel.)

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200804/2bc38aee/attachment.htm>