[tlhIngan Hol] does the {-ta'} leave room for interpretation for the {-pu'} ?

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 22:34:46 PDT 2020

On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 17:19, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> Lets approach this differently..
> Situation: No hitting has taken place, and all parties involved know this.
> I don't want to say: "I did not hit you (and I did it deliberately)"
> I do want to say: "I did not inflict a deliberate hit on you"

So what you want to say is "I *would have* inflicted a deliberate hit on
you, were I to have hit you?"

Maybe: {[qaqIpbe' 'ach] qaqIp net jalchugh, qaqIpta'}?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200421/23927ff9/attachment.html>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list