[tlhIngan Hol] veQpu' or veQmey ?

[De'vID]

On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 06:27, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 16.05.2019 um 15:23 schrieb Daniel Dadap:
> > Interesting, in this case I’m not certain but I’m tempted to go with
> {-wI'}: “light capable of language”.
>
> Well, thinking more philosophically, if I say that "Kahless is my light"
> you're not saying that that light you talk about is capable of language.
> Kahless is, but the light which he represents is not. It's still just
> "light".
>

chay' pIm {Ho'wI' ghaH qeylIS'e'}, {tamghaywI' ghaH qeylIS'e'}?

maQochbe' HughwI' jIH je.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190516/f308576f/attachment-0015.htm>