[tlhIngan Hol] Apollo mission sentence

[SuStel]

On 5/1/2019 3:13 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> {nay’ DIlmeH Huch} is not a noun-noun construction. It’s not a 
> “genitive” (termed “possessive” in TKD). It is money 
> for-the-purpose-of-buying-a-dish-of-food. It’s money with a mission.
>
> Note that this is an uncommon construction, probably not justified by 
> canon, because the general rule is that while a verb with {-meH} can 
> describe the purpose of a noun or it can describe the purpose of a 
> verb, there is a distinctive difference in form depending on whether 
> it describes a noun or a verb.
>
> When it describes a noun, the verb with {-meH} will, in all examples 
> I’ve seen, NOT HAVE A SUBJECT OR OBJECT.

Untrue.

*qaSuchmeH 'eb*/opportunity for me to visit you.
/http://klingonska.org/canon/1998-01-18b-news.txt


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190501/6923be96/attachment.htm>