<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/1/2019 3:13 PM, Will Martin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:96561D96-3895-4A11-9AE7-5E89C352E60A@mac.com">{nay’
DIlmeH Huch} is not a noun-noun construction. It’s not a
“genitive” (termed “possessive” in TKD). It is money
for-the-purpose-of-buying-a-dish-of-food. It’s money with a
mission.
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Note that this is an uncommon construction, probably
not justified by canon, because the general rule is that while a
verb with {-meH} can describe the purpose of a noun or it can
describe the purpose of a verb, there is a distinctive
difference in form depending on whether it describes a noun or a
verb.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">When it describes a noun, the verb with {-meH} will,
in all examples I’ve seen, NOT HAVE A SUBJECT OR OBJECT. </div>
</blockquote>
<p>Untrue.</p>
<p><b>qaSuchmeH 'eb</b><i> opportunity for me to visit you.<br>
</i><a href="http://klingonska.org/canon/1998-01-18b-news.txt">http://klingonska.org/canon/1998-01-18b-news.txt</a></p>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>