[tlhIngan Hol] [Spam] Re: {-be'} on {-lu'}.. seriously ?

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Tue Jan 23 03:53:17 PST 2018

On 23 January 2018 at 12:39, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:

> There are several examples with {-lu'}, and each of them combined with
> {-be'} make me see them as the negation of the verb, not the suffix.

I may be wrong, but I think there are no canon examples with {-lu'be'}
except for {tu'lu'be'}. I'd avoid {-lu'be'}. My feeling is that it's
technically ungrammatical, but would be understood as slightly sloppy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180123/f8831d5a/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list