[tlhIngan Hol] Expressing "all of us"

mayqel qunenoS mihkoun at gmail.com
Sun Jan 28 06:51:11 PST 2018

> My objection is the same whichever phrase you use.

I'm rather confused.

Reading this thread, I understood the reasons which would raise objections
with regards to the use of {maH Hoch}. And in particular, how the {maH
Hoch} violates the accord rule.

But I can't understand which rule is violated by {Hoch maH}. Is it
ungrammatical or wrong ? And if yes, how ? Reading this thread, I can't
understand how its use could be considered wrong.

Don't misunderstand me; I'm not arguing just to argue. I sincerely can't
understand how the {Hoch maH} could be considered wrong.

~ nI'ghma

On Jan 28, 2018 16:21, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 1/28/2018 9:08 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> SuStel:
> > This is what mayqel threatened to do, and I'm pretty sure he's
> > planning on using it in lieu of *ever* using a straight *maH.*
> hahaha ! Actually I won't. The part where I said "I will be using it like
> there is no tomorrow", of my original message, meant: "I will be using it,
> if it is indeed correct".
> Since there are doubts however, I will not use it at all. I *will* be
> using though (as if there's no tomorrow..) Rhona's {Hoch maH}. Because as I
> understand there's no objection against the use of it.
> If there is though, then someone please do tell me, before I start using
> it.
> My objection is the same whichever phrase you use. As some people are fond
> of saying, Klingon is not a code for English (or Greek). You don't just
> translate individual phrases one-to-one and just plug them into a formula
> to make a sentence. English users casually toss out *we all* and *you all*
> (usually as *y'all*) when they mean just *we* and *you (plural).* And
> only when they're speaking certain dialects of English.
> If your sentence would make just as much sense without the *all,* LEAVE
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180128/9c800d91/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list